Set this nodes subscripe and publish topic prefix Enables and select radio type (if attached) I'll have a poke around the core code and see if I can't remove something I'm not using - though I'm expecting 'optional' features to be configurable and defaulted to off, so as mentioned, it will take some creativity.
As mentioned, sketch is pretty much stock. If it should be possible, any ideas where I could have gone wrong? (appreciate this is a pretty open question) The only hint that I'm not alone with this issue is this quote from Anticimex "Soft signing on master with a ethernet gw will not fit as master looks currently and on a AtMega328" This was here 4 months ago.Ĭan someone please verify that Soft signing is currently not possible with the MQTT Gateway on the Development branch (2.0.0-beta).
Besides configuring SoftSPI and the necessary network connectivity IPs (including a static one on the gateway), I've done nothing else to the sketch. I can't figure out why the gateway is too large for the Nano. With the gateway missing the MY_SIGNING_SOFT, the sensor reports "Message is not signed, but it should have been! verify fail" when told to do something. I've got all the HMAC personalization done and loaded into the gateway and the sensor. Maximum is 30,720 bytes." (MY_DEBUG has been commented out) Trouble is, with adding #define MY_SIGNING_SOFT to the stock Dev branch GatewayW5100MQTTClient sketch, I'm getting "Sketch uses 31,070 bytes (101%) of program storage space. For this, I'm coming back around and activating Signing.
The sensor currently under construction will be smartening up the garage door controller. With the exception of the ir stuff, all are working and connected to OpenHAB via Mosquitto.
Here's my gateway, a remote temp/switch sensor and a combo RGB controller and temp sensor/ir unit. I've been quite active and successful on the build front since I started here a few weeks ago. Firstly, thanks for all the great info and advice around the place.
0 kommentar(er)
